{
  "handle": "Callshort",
  "gloss": "A perceived shortfall in the thinking a situation calls for, read as unwilling, unable, or deliberately undeclared",
  "mechanism": "The perceiver notices an {{incongruity}} between the thinking a situation calls for and the thinking another party shows in it, and records one reading of why. Unwilling: the effort was available in this situation and was not spent. Unable: the effort was not available in this situation. Undeclared: one of the two, with the choice deliberately withheld. The reading is held as a {{hypothesis}} about this situation, not as a finding about the party. If the shortfall disappears when the question is put differently, or comes from the parties holding different premises, the callshort is withdrawn rather than re-read.",
  "invariants": [
    "Carries exactly one reading: unwilling, unable, or undeclared.",
    "An undeclared reading attributes the shortfall to neither will nor capacity.",
    "The reading is about this situation and makes no claim about the party's general willingness or ability.",
    "Quotes the observable the perception rests on."
  ],
  "failure_modes": [
    "Default unwilling: unwilling is read with no observable that separates it from unable.",
    "Rift misread: the shortfall came from differing premises or from how the question was put, not from effort.",
    "Projection: the perceiver's own effort or limits at that point are read into the other party.",
    "Veiled accusation: an undeclared reading is delivered in a way that imputes unwillingness.",
    "Trait drift: readings about separate situations are summed into a claim about the party."
  ],
  "data_schema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "situation",
      "observable",
      "reading",
      "would_tell_against"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "situation": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "The situation and the thinking it called for"
      },
      "observable": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "The quoted or pointed-to evidence of the shortfall"
      },
      "step": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Where the shortfall shows, for example noticing an assumption, grasping an argument, or following an implication"
      },
      "reading": {
        "type": "string",
        "enum": [
          "unwilling",
          "unable",
          "undeclared"
        ]
      },
      "would_tell_against": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "An observation that would tell against the reading. For an undeclared reading, an observation that would show the shortfall is not one of effort."
      }
    }
  },
  "_meta": {
    "path": [
      "Mind",
      "Reasoning"
    ],
    "ring": 2,
    "tier": 2,
    "related": [
      "EmpathySim#33c4",
      "Abduction#e738",
      "Check#6890"
    ],
    "minted": "2026-10-05T20:03:20+02:00"
  },
  "sema_id": "sema:Callshort#mh:SHA-256:95258b0368b6bbb08b65a09c3e4274c0cbded3452418db036be54234482ff0ff",
  "sema_ref": "Callshort#9525",
  "sema_stub": "9525",
  "dependencies": {
    "references": {
      "hypothesis": "sema:Hypothesis#mh:SHA-256:09894332330937ab8ffd172087883db3adeddf6b7d4ca2befe31832416dedc14",
      "incongruity": "sema:Incongruity#mh:SHA-256:479ed6c65501ca52ea6149d3e47638291f40158f4e73d8a5c2d71869da4006dc"
    }
  },
  "sema_layer": "Mind",
  "sema_category": "Reasoning",
  "used_by": {
    "references": {
      "Premisebridge": "sema:Premisebridge#mh:SHA-256:73eb4e6af98dcb9a30af4d1e5aab759621d22fe1e8122b9e986e6ce2cfa1d50a"
    }
  }
}